I was hoping to not have to do a third itteration of this ongoing Malfeasence. Malfeasance is an act that is illegal and causes physical or monetary harm to someone else. Malfeasance is intentional conduct that is wrongful or unlawful, especially by officials or public employees. The state of Oklahoma has cheated every chance it can get in order to get “out of state investors” lured in to the pay to play scheme that they are calling “OMMA.” This scheme involves private attorneys in several counties who consult on Cannabis Grows as a form of downpayment to become a full partner in the Cannabis grow. The same attorney will represent their competitor after unlawful actions against the competitor have taken place at the Federal Level and refuse to uphold the victims rights after malicious prosecutions take place at the county level. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and now Department of Homeland Security, specifically all the way down to the county level. The unlawful actions were so harmful and libelous that the state of Oklahoma formed a Federal Task Force last September in order to cover their unlawful activity in the future.
This website had published some articles “Has OMMA Made False Claims Against License Holders Using Local News and District Attorneys to Retaliate?” and “Part II of Oklahoma Regulatory Agencies Using Local News to Spread Misinformation” which spell out extrinsic fraud. Extrinsic fraud is when someone tricks or lies to another person outside of the situation, which causes them to miss important information or not be able to participate fairly. This often happens in legal cases or contracts. Extrinsic fraud is an act of deception or misrepresentation outside the event itself which deprives the victim of material information or participation.
The increase of Militarized Force against the people of the United States of America whilst growing a plant is part of the regulatory capture that the authors of the laws and regulations knew would become inevitable. Oklahoma has escelated the reach of their regulations to include the National Guard.
“On August 20, agents with the A.G.’s Office partnered with multiple law enforcement agencies to investigate the grow. Participating agencies included the Attorney General’s Organized Crime Task Force, the Oklahoma Medical Marijuana Authority, Okmulgee County Sheriff’s Office, the Tulsa County Sheriff’s Office, the Oklahoma National Guard Civil Support Team and the Department of Homeland Security. Officials say 1,244 pounds of processed marijuana, more than 3,000 marijuana plants, three firearms and $25,000 in cash were found.”
Attorney General Gentner Drummond said this operation showcased the Organized Crime Task Force’s partnership with local law enforcement as they investigate illegal grows across the state.
“We are continuing to send the message to drug cartels and crime syndicates that they need to get out of our state,” Drummond said. “We will continue to crack down on illegal grow facilities until they have all been shut down.” – Raid at Okmulgee County grow leads to marijuana, guns
- The first question I would ask is which agency confiscated the plants?
- How far along were the 3,000 plants?
- Ripe and ready for harvest?
- Were the plants weighed on a state regulated scale?
- Did the 1,244 pounds of processed marijuana have METRC tags?
- How was the “processed” cannabis presented? Example: was it pounds of extract? or weighed out in packages?
- Who signed off on the chain of command on the evidence?
- Where is the plant material stored now?
- Does the County Clerks office have any staff member’s direct family that own processing licenses which would touch any evidence from these raids?
- What made the grow “illegal?”
- Where is the evidence of a cartel or crime syndicate?
- Is Gentner Drummond projecting keywords in to the media in order to justify funding for plant investigations?
Not sure how the people of Oklahoma expect to feel free from illegal search and seizure with the National Guard investigating their garden.
Not even their top Attorney Drummond will play by the rules. He has been made aware of severe infractions of people’s rights all across the state, by me personally in writing, and he refuses to correct the errors and allow remedy to take place. Qualified Rights. The opposite of Qualified Immunity, which is where a person has to “qualify” to have a right upheld in court. Otherwise the Court Clerk refuses to submit your winning argument, motion or Writ. Ask me how I know. As a Pro Se litigant in several jurisdictions, the scope of the corruption is Nationwide. Corruption is rampant because officers of the court swear an oath to the court to hold the “institution of the court house” and supreme power behind it, infallible. Weaponized Justice. There are Oklahoma counties that are reporting 5 Million dollars of revenue per year each, just from court costs, fees, fines and seizures.
Hard to trust a system that has no oversight, uses the color of law to commit crimes, refuses to hold its members accountable, cheats to win, and uses your money to pay their salary. That is a big flaw, using qualified immunity to commit crimes, and spending tax dollars to do so.
I asked the AI a question, this is it’s response.
“The National Guard’s ability to conduct law enforcement activities in the United States is primarily governed by two key factors:
State Authority
When operating under state authority, the National Guard is not subject to the restrictions of the Posse Comitatus Act[4]. This means that when activated by a state governor, National Guard units can perform law enforcement duties within their home state[4]. This authority stems from the National Guard’s unique dual state-federal status.
Posse Comitatus Act Exemption
The Posse Comitatus Act generally prohibits federal military personnel from engaging in domestic law enforcement activities[4]. However, the National Guard is specifically exempted from this restriction when operating under state control[4]. This exemption allows the National Guard to perform a wide range of law enforcement functions when called upon by state authorities.
Key Legal Provisions
1. Title 32 of the U.S. Code: This section of federal law governs the National Guard and outlines its roles and responsibilities, including provisions for state-activated duty[3].
2. State Laws: Each state has its own laws and regulations governing the use of its National Guard for law enforcement purposes.
3. National Guard Mutual Assistance Counter-Drug Activities Compact: This interstate agreement, adopted by many states, provides a framework for National Guard units to assist in drug interdiction and counter-drug activities across state lines[2].
It’s important to note that when the National Guard is federalized under Title 10 authority, it becomes subject to the same restrictions as other federal military forces regarding domestic law enforcement[1]. However, in its state role, the National Guard remains a flexible tool for governors to address various emergencies and law enforcement needs within their states.”
Citations:
[1] https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/what-does-us-national-guard-do
[2] https://app.leg.wa.gov/rcw/default.aspx?cite=38.08.500
[3] https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?edition=prelim&path=%2Fprelim%40title32
[4] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posse_Comitatus_Act
[5] https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/LSB/LSB10121
[6] https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/posse-comitatus-act-explained
[7] https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/insurrection-act-explained
[8] https://nationalguard.com/careers/police-and-protection
